How to Use Partial Derivative Method Due to Flexural Strains?
Let's illustrate how to solve the deflections of beams using the partial derivative method. We shall demonstrate how to solve the deflection at a certain point along a beam.
The solution presented is in SI. The author will update the post soon to reflect English units.
Let's consider a simple beam shown. It only consists of an \(81 kN\) point load applied \(6m\) from the left end. In this post, we shall see how to use the partial derivative method to solve for the vertical translation at \(E\).
Main Solution
Want to access the remaining content?
You're a Member!
Click to expand on exclusive content
Want to access the remaining content?
Become a Member
When you sign-up and subscribe to WeTheStudy, you’ll get the following benefits:
The first step is introducing a placeholder load at point \(E\). Since we are looking for its translation, we place a point load \(F\). If we are looking for rotation at a point, we introduce a placeholder couple instead.
The direction of \(F\) will correspond to our assumed direction translation at \(E\), downwards.
Reactions
Afterwards, we need to solve for the reactions of the beam example. In this case, we'll need to express it in terms of the placeholder load \(F\)
\(\sum{M_B}=0]\space{\circlearrowright_+}\)
\(R_A(9)-F(9-2)-81(3)=0\)
\(R_A=27+\frac{7}{9}F\)
\(\sum{F_v}=0]\space{\uparrow_+}\)
\(R_A-F-81+D_v=0\)
\(27+\frac{7}{9}F-F-81+D_v=0\)
\(D_v=54+\frac{2}{9}F\)
Formulate M, E, and I Equations
With a placeholder introduced, we formulate moment equations \(M\), \(E\), and \(I\) based on the real and placeholder loads.
Creating \(M\) expressions is similar to constructing moment equations. Its flexural rigidity \(EI\) varies per segment. We can see how we can formulate these expressions in the following section:
Afterward, we apply the partial derivative equation to solve for the deflection:
\(\Delta_{E_v}=\int \frac{M}{E I} \times \frac{\partial M}{\partial F} d x\)
\(\Delta_{E_v}=\frac{1}{E I} \int_0^2\left(27+\frac{7}{9} F\right)(x)\left(\frac{7}{9} x\right) d x+\frac{1}{E I} \int_2^5\left[\left(27+\frac{7}{9} F\right)(x)-F(x-2)\right]\left(-\frac{2}{9} x+2\right) d x\)
\(+\frac{1}{E(2 I)} \int_5^6\left[\left(27+\frac{7}{9} F\right)(x)-F(x-2)\right]\left(-\frac{2}{9} x+2\right) d x+\frac{1}{E(2 I)} \int_6^9[\left(27+\frac{7}{9} F\right)(x)\)
\(-F(x-2)-81(x-6)]\left(-\frac{2}{9} x+2\right) d x\)
Notice that the translation at \(E\) is in terms of two variables: the placeholder load \(F\) and \(x\). We cannot directly evaluate the integral because of it; however, we recall that the purpose of \(F\) is to represent the required deflection. So, we let \(F = 0\) to have:
\(\Delta_{E_v}=\frac{1}{E I} \int_0^2(27)(x)\left(\frac{7}{9} x\right) d x+\frac{1}{E I} \int_2^5(27)(x)\left(-\frac{2}{9} x+2\right) d x\)
\(+\frac{1}{E(2 I)} \int_5^6(27)(x)\left(-\frac{2}{9} x+2\right) d x+\frac{1}{E(2 I)} \int_6^9\left[(27(x)-81(x-6)]\left(-\frac{2}{9} x+2\right) d x\right.\)
\(\Delta_{E_v}=\frac{1001}{2 E I}=\frac{500.5}{EI}\)
The positive direction indicates that the translation at \(E) is downward, which was our initial assumption.