Let's model the deflected shape of the beam using the double integration method. In this post, we'll explore using a general equation to model the slope and translation.
WeTheStudy lets you connect ideas
Learn more

Continuing from this example, let's learn how to use the double integration method to model the beam's deflection. We shall model it as a whole for this example. For the alternative solution, click here.

The solution presented is in SI. The author will update the post soon to reflect English units.

Main Solution

There are two ways to solve this problem using the double integration method: segment and general equation analysis. 

While the former is a unique approach, it's cumbersome, especially with multiple loads. In this post, we'll explore the latter.

Want to access the remaining content?
You're a Member!
Click to expand on exclusive content
Want to access the remaining content?

Become a Member

When you sign-up and subscribe to WeTheStudy, you’ll get the following benefits:

No ads! (yey!)
Complete access to all articles
Ability to track your progress in the tree

SIGN-UP

Complete Your Checkout

When you complete your account, here are the following benefits:

No ads! (yey!)
Complete access to all articles
Ability to track your progress in the tree

PROCEED CHECKOUT

Set Up General Equations

In this method, we will analyze the beam as a whole. To start, we would need to formulate general M, E, and I equations - expressions that would include all bending effects, changes in material, and cross-section properties for the beam.

Since we have assumed that E and I are constant for the whole beam, we'll only concentrate on creating a general moment M equation.

General Moment Equation

The first step is to create a moment equation encompassing all bending effects of each load. This single equation allows us to find M at any point.

Creating one is similar to forming any moment equation on any segment. To construct it, we have to:

  1. Place the cutting plane at the last point of the beam. Doing this would divide the beam into two parts: the left with all loading conditions and the right part, which is the last joint.
  2. Choose the left part and create a moment equation for all loads on the side.

The left side of the section has only five loads; we only consider these effects:

  • M1=27 is due to the 27kNm couple at A
  • M2=90x2 is due to the 90kN reaction at B
  • M3=53x23+452x6.52+53x6.53 is due to the 45kN/m uniform varying load between B and C
  • M4=18x6.52+18x112 is due to the 36kN/m uniform distributed load between C and D
  • M5=10534x11 is due to the 263.25kN reaction at D

The sum of these will lead us to the general moment equation:

Mx=i=1n=M1+M2++Mn

M=27+90x253x23+452x6.52+53x6.53

18x6.52+18x112+10534x11

One important thing to note is that this equation must be in this form.

The domain is from 0 to L, which is the beam's length; however, we must note that the terms are explicitly defined.

Explicitly-Defined Terms

To explain what is meant by explicitly defined terms, let's test our equation.

Say that we are interested in finding the moment when x=1. One may insert x=1 into our general equation to get M at that point, but doing so will lead to a wrong answer. The correct M value is 27kNm based on the moment equation of AB.

2727+901253123+45216.52+5316.53

1816.52+181112+10534111

To explain what went wrong, let's look at our equation closer. Each term represents M of a load as specified in M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5. If we substitute x=1 into the equation and evaluate the result, we would consider the bending effects of ALL loading conditions, which is wrong.

To get the correct one, we should only consider terms relevant to x=1 and disregard others. To help us remember this condition, we have intentionally replaced the parenthesis with angle brackets for terms involving the position x.

If the value inside the brackets is negative, we don't consider it. So, evaluating the general equation with x=1 will lead to:

Mx=1=27

This result is similar to the moment equation at AB.

Apply Bernoulli-Euler Beam Equation

With the general equation set-up, we can apply the Bernoulli-Euler Beam Equation. If we have any functions of E and I, we should also consider it here:

d2Δdx2=1EI(27+90x253x23+452x6.52+53x6.53

18x6.52+18x112+10534x11)

Find General Solution

Afterward, we are ready to find the general slope and deflection equations.

General Slope Equations

Let's start by finding the general slope equation. We integrate the Bernoulli-Euler Beam Equation once to get it:

dΔdx=1EI(27x+45x22512x24+152x6.53+512x6.54

6x6.53+6x113+10538x112+C1)

General Deflection Equations

After getting the slope equation, we integrate it again to get the general deflection equation:

Δ=1EI(272x2+15x23112x25+158x6.54+112x6.55

32x6.54+32x114+3518x113+C1x+C2)

Find Particular Solution

In this example, we need to solve only two constants of integration C1 and C2. As we did in segment analysis, we create conditions first.

Conditions

Conditions are constraints or facts that we know about the structure. The number of conditions we need is equal to the number of constants of integration. So, if we have two constants, we need at least two conditions.

Boundary Conditions

Boundary conditions deal with restrictions at the supports. For example, fixed supports in ideal cantilevers or restrained beams do not permit deflection.

Let's continue with our analysis. We know the vertical translation at the roller B(2,0) is restricted. We can use this to create one condition.

ΔBv=0,x=2

Before evaluating, it's essential to note that the terms are explicitly defined. We must disregard some terms if the values inside the brackets are negative.

0=1EI(27222+15223112225+15826.54+11226.55

3226.54+322114+35182113+C12+C2)

Boundary Condition 1: 2C1+C2=54

For the other condition, we look at D(11,0) or the hinge support. Since vertical translation is not allowed, we use this to form the other condition:

ΔDv=0,x=11

0=1EI(272112+1511231121125+158116.54+112116.55

32116.54+3211114+351811113+C111+C2)

Boundary Condition 2: 11C1+C2=50913964

Solving the Constants of Integration

With these two conditions, we are now ready to solve for C1 and C2.

Using algebra, we have:

C1=877.92

C2=1701.84

Summarize Equations

With constants of integration solved, the final step is to summarize the equations by substituting constants of integration:

Slope Equation

dΔdx=1EI(27x+45x22512x24+152x6.53+512x6.54

6x6.53+6x113+10538x112877.92)

Deflection Equation

Δ=1EI(272x2+15x23112x25+158x6.54+112x6.55

32x6.54+32x114+3518x113877.92x+1701.84)

The equations above are the slope and deflection of the beam example with explicitly defined terms. With this, you can determine the rotation or translation at any beam point.

From this example, we can see the benefits of using this method over the other. We only need one equation to make rather than per segment, and we have fewer conditions to formulate.

General and Segment Equations

Let's recall the beam limits per segment.

  • AB: 0x<2
  • BC: 2x<6.5
  • CD: 6.5x<11
  • DE: 11x<12.5

We can use these limits to find the segment equation from the general expression.

As an example, let's evaluate the general slope equation with BC:2x<6.5 as our limits:

dΔdx=1EI(27x+45x22512x24+152x6.53+512x6.54

6x6.53+6x113+10538x112877.92)

dΔdx=θ=1EI(512x4+103x3+35x24193x704.59)

This result is similar to the segmented slope equation.

Slope and Deflection Diagrams

We can represent these equations using a graph. If we plot the slope θ against position x and deflection Δ against x, we get the slope and deflection diagrams of the structure.

Slope Diagram

Deflection Diagram

These diagrams assume the beam example's flexural rigidity EI is constant.

Tree Navigation

See how this article relates to other ideas

Now Loading...

Children
No children (yet)
Created On
June 5, 2023
Updated On
February 23, 2024
Contributors
Edgar Christian Dirige
Founder
References

WeTheStudy original content

Revision
1.00
Got some questions? Something wrong? Contact us
Now Loading...